Transfer.
There are two questions at issue.
1. Is he pensioned or entitled to be pensioned under his Police Agreement.
2. If so, is he fit to retire on a pension.
As to the first, the Governor's despatch is not explicit. Rationally, one should say no, but Mr Cleaver says that he was never discharged, had he accepted the transfer not unfairly believed that he still received his pension under his Agreement.
The idea is that having been ill, his being unfit for further work absolves him. I would first telegraph to Chief Power, Special Branch, whether Cleaver is entitled to pension under his Agreement.
Doctor reports health good. His conversion makes it difficult to assess.
As to the second, if he came out 3 months ago and when he came out he was healthier.
There is a reference in her 1st paragraph to this 12 years being prejudicial to the record, which is not very clear but I think I saw a copy at home once.
Jeansfer.
There are
A me.
two questions at
ا محتا
1. Is he pensioned or entitled & be feusioned under his Police Agreement.
2. If ash is he i'll maybe
on a pension.
to retive on a
as to the first the frewar's des patch it ach explicite. Ratially
"should say no, but hd Cleaver
says
that he
wo
hever
Lave
Lad he
accepted the deansfer not farinly believed that he still received his pension
Jennilegeon
مه
Agreement.
under his Agreem
し
looking
mans, & Hong hole Las no double, been ill, of
Lis being
The idea
hit for Ifurther work seolus Auditions.
unfit
تا
639
Iwould firs 6 lilegraph
Is Sief. Power.
Special
ds Cleaver entitled, Jolin
Jension endocreatio
Doctor reports health good.
to
aad.
His conversion mit it drie 7/6.
under his Ichis
Ponie
2.
came & an and when he
It Comes
I 3 months
Lealthier
7
&greement in her 1 papage this 12 Jeax be pre
to the second difage Bern:
reford is not my clear but I
Lover faw a
Whoyce
Ol
home
I was one.
Euso fine 7.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.